https://lumoscia.com/index.php/erp/issue/feedEducational Research & Practice2026-09-08T17:41:12+03:00Open Journal Systems<p>Educational Research & Practice is an international, open-access, peer-reviewed journal that publishes original research, theoretical studies, and practical insights in the field of education. The journal provides a platform for educators, researchers, and policymakers to present innovative approaches, evidence-based practices, and interdisciplinary studies that enhance teaching, learning, and educational policy globally.</p>https://lumoscia.com/index.php/erp/article/view/994Optimizing Pedagogical Models through Integrated Datasets: A Novel Framework for Adaptive Learning Systems2026-08-24T15:04:32+03:00Chris Halladmin@admin.comAdrian Jonesadmin@admin.comKim Milleradmin@admin.com<p>The educational landscape is increasingly impacted by the integration of data-driven methodologies, yet existing pedagogical models often fall short in adaptability and relevance. This paper presents a novel optimization framework designed to enhance adaptive learning systems by integrating diverse datasets. Utilizing a mixed-methods approach, we employed quantitative metrics, including regression analysis and machine learning algorithms, to evaluate the effectiveness of our proposed model across various educational contexts. Our findings indicate significant improvements in learning outcomes, specifically a 25% increase in student engagement and a 30% decrease in knowledge retention errors. These results highlight the potential of data-driven pedagogical frameworks in addressing the evolving needs of learners in the 21st century.</p>2026-03-27T00:00:00+02:00Copyright (c) 2026 Educational Research & Practicehttps://lumoscia.com/index.php/erp/article/view/992A Comparative Analysis of Cognitive Load Theory and Constructivist Learning: Evaluating Competing Approaches in Higher Education2026-08-24T14:55:26+03:00Riley Thomasadmin@admin.comElla Brownadmin@admin.comKai Greenadmin@admin.comRobin Nelsonadmin@admin.com<p>This study examines the efficacy of Cognitive Load Theory (CLT) versus Constructivist Learning approaches in higher education settings. Utilizing a mixed-methods design, data were collected from three universities through structured surveys and in-depth interviews. Our findings reveal that while CLT shows significant improvements in task completion rates and student retention (p < 0.05), Constructivist Learning fosters deeper comprehension and critical thinking skills. This analysis elucidates the strengths and weaknesses of both frameworks, contributing to a nuanced understanding of pedagogical effectiveness in contemporary educational paradigms.</p>2026-03-27T00:00:00+02:00Copyright (c) 2026 Educational Research & Practicehttps://lumoscia.com/index.php/erp/article/view/1053Leveraging Machine Learning Algorithms for Adaptive Learning Pathways in Undergraduate Mathematics Education: A Case Study2026-09-08T17:36:31+03:00Adrian Wrightadmin@admin.comAlex Robertsadmin@admin.comJacob Davisadmin@admin.comTaylor Wrightadmin@admin.com<p>With the increasing reliance on technology in education, the need for adaptive learning systems tailored to individual student needs has become paramount. This study employs machine learning algorithms to develop personalized learning pathways for undergraduate mathematics students. Utilizing a dataset comprising over 1,000 student learning interactions, we applied supervised learning techniques, specifically Random Forest and Gradient Boosting, to predict student performance and optimize learning materials. The findings indicate a significant improvement in student engagement and performance, with average assessment scores rising by 15% after implementing the adaptive approaches. These results underscore the necessity of data-driven methodologies in contemporary educational practices, providing insights into the potential for broader applications across various subjects.</p>2026-03-27T00:00:00+02:00Copyright (c) 2026 Educational Research & Practicehttps://lumoscia.com/index.php/erp/article/view/993A Comparative Analysis of Pedagogical Strategies: Evaluating the Efficacy of Collaborative Learning vs. Individualized Instruction in Higher Education2026-08-24T15:00:06+03:00Alex Whiteadmin@admin.comChris Mooreadmin@admin.comEmily Collinsadmin@admin.comMorgan Milleradmin@admin.com<p>This study investigates the ongoing debate surrounding pedagogical strategies in higher education, particularly focusing on collaborative learning and individualized instruction. Utilizing a mixed-methods approach, we conducted a comprehensive survey among 500 students across four universities, complemented by case studies involving 20 instructors to gain qualitative insights. Quantitative findings reveal that students engaged in collaborative learning exhibited a 25% increase in academic performance, as measured by final grades, compared to their peers in individualized settings. Furthermore, qualitative data indicates enhanced student satisfaction and engagement levels. This work contributes to the ongoing discourse on effective teaching methodologies and provides evidence-based recommendations for educational practitioners.</p>2026-03-27T00:00:00+02:00Copyright (c) 2026 Educational Research & Practicehttps://lumoscia.com/index.php/erp/article/view/1054Reassessing Pedagogical Foundations: A Critical Evaluation of Learner-Centric Approaches in Contemporary Education2026-09-08T17:41:12+03:00Adrian Robinsonadmin@admin.comRiley Nelsonadmin@admin.comNico Wilsonadmin@admin.comTaylor Wrightadmin@admin.com<p>This study investigates the paradigm shift from traditional teacher-centric models to learner-centric approaches in education, emphasizing their relevance in the framework of 2024-2026 educational policies. Utilizing a mixed-methods design, we analyzed quantitative data from 500 educational institutions and conducted qualitative interviews with 50 educators. Our findings reveal significant improvements in student engagement (p < 0.01) and academic performance, with a 30% increase in student retention rates. However, we also identified persistent challenges, such as inadequate teacher training and resource allocation. This research highlights the necessity for a systemic reevaluation of current educational strategies to enhance learner outcomes effectively.</p>2026-03-27T00:00:00+02:00Copyright (c) 2026 Educational Research & Practice