https://lumoscia.com/index.php/erp/issue/feed Educational Research & Practice 2026-09-08T17:41:12+03:00 Open Journal Systems <p>Educational Research &amp; Practice is an international, open-access, peer-reviewed journal that publishes original research, theoretical studies, and practical insights in the field of education. The journal provides a platform for educators, researchers, and policymakers to present innovative approaches, evidence-based practices, and interdisciplinary studies that enhance teaching, learning, and educational policy globally.</p> https://lumoscia.com/index.php/erp/article/view/994 Optimizing Pedagogical Models through Integrated Datasets: A Novel Framework for Adaptive Learning Systems 2026-08-24T15:04:32+03:00 Chris Hall admin@admin.com Adrian Jones admin@admin.com Kim Miller admin@admin.com <p>The educational landscape is increasingly impacted by the integration of data-driven methodologies, yet existing pedagogical models often fall short in adaptability and relevance. This paper presents a novel optimization framework designed to enhance adaptive learning systems by integrating diverse datasets. Utilizing a mixed-methods approach, we employed quantitative metrics, including regression analysis and machine learning algorithms, to evaluate the effectiveness of our proposed model across various educational contexts. Our findings indicate significant improvements in learning outcomes, specifically a 25% increase in student engagement and a 30% decrease in knowledge retention errors. These results highlight the potential of data-driven pedagogical frameworks in addressing the evolving needs of learners in the 21st century.</p> 2026-03-27T00:00:00+02:00 Copyright (c) 2026 Educational Research & Practice https://lumoscia.com/index.php/erp/article/view/992 A Comparative Analysis of Cognitive Load Theory and Constructivist Learning: Evaluating Competing Approaches in Higher Education 2026-08-24T14:55:26+03:00 Riley Thomas admin@admin.com Ella Brown admin@admin.com Kai Green admin@admin.com Robin Nelson admin@admin.com <p>This study examines the efficacy of Cognitive Load Theory (CLT) versus Constructivist Learning approaches in higher education settings. Utilizing a mixed-methods design, data were collected from three universities through structured surveys and in-depth interviews. Our findings reveal that while CLT shows significant improvements in task completion rates and student retention (p &lt; 0.05), Constructivist Learning fosters deeper comprehension and critical thinking skills. This analysis elucidates the strengths and weaknesses of both frameworks, contributing to a nuanced understanding of pedagogical effectiveness in contemporary educational paradigms.</p> 2026-03-27T00:00:00+02:00 Copyright (c) 2026 Educational Research & Practice https://lumoscia.com/index.php/erp/article/view/1053 Leveraging Machine Learning Algorithms for Adaptive Learning Pathways in Undergraduate Mathematics Education: A Case Study 2026-09-08T17:36:31+03:00 Adrian Wright admin@admin.com Alex Roberts admin@admin.com Jacob Davis admin@admin.com Taylor Wright admin@admin.com <p>With the increasing reliance on technology in education, the need for adaptive learning systems tailored to individual student needs has become paramount. This study employs machine learning algorithms to develop personalized learning pathways for undergraduate mathematics students. Utilizing a dataset comprising over 1,000 student learning interactions, we applied supervised learning techniques, specifically Random Forest and Gradient Boosting, to predict student performance and optimize learning materials. The findings indicate a significant improvement in student engagement and performance, with average assessment scores rising by 15% after implementing the adaptive approaches. These results underscore the necessity of data-driven methodologies in contemporary educational practices, providing insights into the potential for broader applications across various subjects.</p> 2026-03-27T00:00:00+02:00 Copyright (c) 2026 Educational Research & Practice https://lumoscia.com/index.php/erp/article/view/993 A Comparative Analysis of Pedagogical Strategies: Evaluating the Efficacy of Collaborative Learning vs. Individualized Instruction in Higher Education 2026-08-24T15:00:06+03:00 Alex White admin@admin.com Chris Moore admin@admin.com Emily Collins admin@admin.com Morgan Miller admin@admin.com <p>This study investigates the ongoing debate surrounding pedagogical strategies in higher education, particularly focusing on collaborative learning and individualized instruction. Utilizing a mixed-methods approach, we conducted a comprehensive survey among 500 students across four universities, complemented by case studies involving 20 instructors to gain qualitative insights. Quantitative findings reveal that students engaged in collaborative learning exhibited a 25% increase in academic performance, as measured by final grades, compared to their peers in individualized settings. Furthermore, qualitative data indicates enhanced student satisfaction and engagement levels. This work contributes to the ongoing discourse on effective teaching methodologies and provides evidence-based recommendations for educational practitioners.</p> 2026-03-27T00:00:00+02:00 Copyright (c) 2026 Educational Research & Practice https://lumoscia.com/index.php/erp/article/view/1054 Reassessing Pedagogical Foundations: A Critical Evaluation of Learner-Centric Approaches in Contemporary Education 2026-09-08T17:41:12+03:00 Adrian Robinson admin@admin.com Riley Nelson admin@admin.com Nico Wilson admin@admin.com Taylor Wright admin@admin.com <p>This study investigates the paradigm shift from traditional teacher-centric models to learner-centric approaches in education, emphasizing their relevance in the framework of 2024-2026 educational policies. Utilizing a mixed-methods design, we analyzed quantitative data from 500 educational institutions and conducted qualitative interviews with 50 educators. Our findings reveal significant improvements in student engagement (p &lt; 0.01) and academic performance, with a 30% increase in student retention rates. However, we also identified persistent challenges, such as inadequate teacher training and resource allocation. This research highlights the necessity for a systemic reevaluation of current educational strategies to enhance learner outcomes effectively.</p> 2026-03-27T00:00:00+02:00 Copyright (c) 2026 Educational Research & Practice