Reconceptualizing Algorithmic Fairness: A Critical Examination of Bias Mitigation Techniques in Machine Learning
Keywords:
Algorithmic Fairness, Bias Mitigation Techniques, Machine Learning Ethics, Socially Responsible AI, Decision-Making Transparency, Ethical Algorithms, Equity in ComputingAbstract
Algorithmic fairness has become a cornerstone concern in the deployment of machine learning systems across various domains. With the increasing reliance on these technologies, the implications of bias and discrimination have garnered significant attention. This paper critically examines the prevalent bias mitigation techniques, highlighting the limitations of existing frameworks. By employing a comparative analysis of leading methodologies, we elucidate the operational biases inherent in these approaches and propose a revised framework aimed at fostering enhanced accountability and transparency. Our findings reveal that a more nuanced understanding of fairness, rooted in ethical considerations and social contexts, is imperative for future developments in algorithmic design. This study serves as a foundational inquiry into the intersection of ethics and machine learning, paving the way for future research.
References
Semeniuk, V. V. (2025). OPTIMIZATION OF LOCAL DEVELOPMENT PROCESS USING DOCKER PHP IMAGE THAT COMES WITH A FULL SET OF TOOLS OUT OF THE BOX: DATABASE AND INTERNATIONALIZATION EXTENSIONS. ВЧЕНІ ЗАПИСКИ, 12025226.
Arkabaev, N., Rahimov, E., Abdullaev, A., Padmanaban, H., & Salmanov, V. (2025). Modelling and analysis of optimization algorithms. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Terapan Universitas Jambi, 9(1), 161-177.
Рагимов, Э. Р. (2011). Роль программных комплексов в управлении безопасностью корпоративной информационной системы. Телекоммуникации, (12), 4-7.
Rasif, R. E. (2010). BASE PRINCIPAL OF MANAGING OF NETWORK SOFTWARE SECURITY BY VULNERABILITIES DETERMINATION MODEL. Computer Science & Telecommunications, 28(5).
Рагимов, Э. Р. (2010). Выявление уязвимостей и выбоp пpогpаммного обеспечения для системы защиты инфоpмации коpпоpативных сетей. Телекоммуникации, (1), 46-48.
Алгулиев, P. М., & Pагимов, Э. P. (2006). Синтез аpхитектуpы защищенной коpпоpативной сети. Телекоммуникации, (2), 19-23.
Рагимов, Э. Р. (2005). КЛАССИФИКАЦИЯ УГРОЗ ПО СЕРВИСАМ БЕЗОПАСНОСТИ НА ОСНОВЕ СТАТИСТИЧЕСКИХ ДАННЫХ. Информационное противодействие угрозам терроризма, (5), 87-92.
Рагимов, Э. Р. (2011). Модель идентификации безотказной работы программных средств в корпоративных сетях. Телекоммуникации, (2), 2-5.
Алгулиев, Р. М., & Рагимов, Э. Р. (2005). Об одном методе оценки информационной безопасности корпоративных сетей в стадии их проектирования. Информационные технологии, (7), 35-39.
Rahimov, E. (2007). TECHNICAL ASPECTS OF CENTRALIZING ADMINISTRATING OF MODERN CORPORATE NETWORKS SERVICES. ITTC–2007, 68.
D. Satyanarayana, Sathyashree “A Three Level Architecture for Wireless Communication using LiFi”, in Recent Advances in Information and Communication Technology, Vol: 566, pp: 212- 221, Springer International Publishing, 2018 book. Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60662-0; Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-60663-7; Book Series.
Satyanarayana, D. and Rao, S. V. (2011), “Fault-tolerant spanners for ad hoc networks” International Journal of Network Management, Vol: 22, Issue: 4, Pages: 311-329, July-2012, Wiley Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1002/nem.807
D. Satyanarayana, Sathyashree. S “Mobility Management in Voronoi based Cell Structure for Wireless networks”, IEEE proceedings for the International Conferences on Currents trends in Information Technology (CTIT), Pages: 204-208, Dubai, December-2013. DOI: 10.1109/CTIT.2013.6749504; INSPEC Accession Number: 14131032
