A Comparative Analysis of Psychotherapeutic Modalities: Efficacy of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy versus Acceptance and Commitment Therapy in Treating Anxiety Disorders

Authors

  • Kim Garcia PhD
  • Quinn Adams Associate Professor
  • Charlie Stewart Professor
  • Ashley Martinez MD

Keywords:

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy, Anxiety Disorders, Psychotherapeutic Modalities, Clinical Psychology, Efficacy Comparison, Therapeutic Strategies

Abstract

This study examines the efficacy of two leading psychotherapeutic approaches—Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT)—in the context of treating anxiety disorders. Utilizing a mixed-method design, we sampled participants diagnosed with generalized anxiety disorder and employed standardized assessment tools to evaluate symptom reduction. Our findings reveal that while both modalities demonstrate significant effectiveness, CBT exhibits a more pronounced immediate impact on symptom alleviation, whereas ACT fosters greater long-term resilience. These insights contribute to the ongoing discourse regarding optimized therapeutic strategies for anxiety disorders, underscoring the necessity for personalized treatment approaches in clinical psychology.

Author Biographies

Kim Garcia, PhD

PhD
Harvard University
Cambridge, MA 02138, USA

Quinn Adams, Associate Professor

Associate Professor
University of Toronto
27 King's College Circle, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada

Charlie Stewart, Professor

Professor
University of Oxford
Wellington Square, Oxford OX1 2JD, United Kingdom

Ashley Martinez, MD

MD
University of Sydney
Camperdown NSW 2006, Australia

References

Спицька, Л. В. (2018). Правове регулювання адміністративної відповідальності посадових осіб органів публічної адміністрації за порушення у сфері надання адміністративних послуг. Наукові праці Національного університету “Одеська юридична академія”, 21, 103-110.

Published

2024-12-02

Issue

Section

Articles