Reassessing Jurisprudential Foundations: A Critical Reevaluation of Legal Norms in the Age of Digital Governance
Keywords:
Digital Governance, Legal Norms, Jurisdictional Challenges, Interdisciplinary Legal Studies, Technological Adaptation, Case Law Analysis, Legal Frameworks, Policy Reforms, Law and TechnologyAbstract
In the context of rapid technological advancement, the legal implications of digital governance have necessitated a critical re-evaluation of traditional jurisprudential frameworks. This study employs a mixed-methods approach, integrating qualitative case studies with quantitative analyses of legal database trends. Our findings reveal alarming gaps in the current legal frameworks to adapt to emerging technologies, highlighting a significant disconnect between established legal norms and the operational realities of digital governance. Furthermore, empirical data indicates that legal practitioners and scholars exhibit a concerning lack of awareness regarding the implications of these technological advancements on legal practices. This article aims to foster a nuanced dialogue about the necessity for reforming legal norms to ensure they remain relevant and effective in the evolving digital landscape. The results underscore the urgency of an interdisciplinary approach to legal studies, combining insights from law, technology, and societal trends to enhance legal adaptability. The critical findings presented herein call for immediate legislative intervention and a paradigmatic shift in legal education and practice.
References
Hasanova, J., & Najafova, K. (2025). Digitization, automation problems and solutions in small business on the example of Azerbaijan. WSEAS Transact. Bus. Econ, 22, 1358-1369.